Hamilton County Agriculture

  



NRCS Staff

  • John Williams, District Conservationist
    Stationed in Butler County - 513-887-3720

NRCS Mission Statement
The Natural Resources Conservation Service provides leadership in a partnership effort to help conserve, maintain, and improve our natural resources and environment.

Our Role in Hamilton County
Our main goal and responsibility is to convey and implement the USDA Farm Bill Programs in Hamilton County.

Explanation of Farm Bill Programs
The Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 is landmark legislation for conservation funding and for focusing on environmental issues. The conservation provisions will assist farmers and ranchers in meeting environmental challenges on their land. This legislation simplifies existing programs and creates new programs to address high priority environmental and production goals. The 2002 Farm Bill enhances the long-term quality of our environmental and conservation of our natural resources.

  • CCRP (Continuous Conservation Reserve Program): This program is for landowners with cropland planted to commodity crops. Eligibility requires the land to have been cropped four years between 1996 and 2001. Cost share pays approximately 50% of the average costs for such practices as: grassed waterways; vegetative filter strips; water control structures; shallow water wetlands; and riparian forest buffers. Landowners will also receive rental payments (based on soil types) for land taken out of production are provided for 10 to 15 years depending on the life of the contract. Additional incentive payments of up to 40% could be obtained through Practice Incentive Payments (PIP) and Signing Incentive Payments (SIP). Landowners can sign up at any time as it is a continuous sign up.
     


    Jeff Barnes (R) and Nate Sturm (L) Survey a waterway site


    Construction of Waterway


    Finished Waterway
         
  • CRP (Conservation Reserve Program): Provides rental payments to producers who plant sensitive lands (such as Highly Erodible Land) to long-term cover. Cover options include trees; cool season grasses; and warm season grasses. Cost share for establishing conservation cover is 50%. The Farm Service Agency will announce the general CRP sign-up when it is available. More information will be available at that time.
     
  • EQIP (Environmental Quality Incentives Program): Provides total resource management system planning on the whole farm. A wide variety of conservation practices are available for cost share, including: rotational grazing systems; waste management systems; alternative watering; heavy use areas; waterways; livestock exclusionary fencing; and pasture planting. Most cost share rates are 50% for installation of practices, but some practices are cost shared up to 100%. A 90% cost share rates is also available for Limited Resource Farmers and New Farmers. Contract periods are from one to 10 years. There is a continuous sign-up period for EQIP; applications are ranked and funded once per year on a funds availability basis.
     


    Pasture Seeding on Ken Grob’s farm


    Heavy Use Area @ Walnut-Creek Stables


    Access Road on Richard Noel’s Farm
         
  • WHIP (Wildlife Habitat Incentive Program): Uses five to 15 year cost share agreements to protect and restore wetland and wildlife habitats. Emphasis is placed on warm-season grassland habitat and wetland habitat creation. To be eligible the area to be treated must be at least 5 acres in size. There is a continuous sign-up period for WHIP; applications are ranked and funded once per year, statewide, on a funds availability basis.
     


    Young deer at the Enderle Wetland site


    Enderle Wetland


    Johnson Tree Plantings
         

These are just the most common programs used in Hamilton County, to find out more visit the Ohio NRCS website by clicking www.oh.nrcs.usda.gov

Here are some other helpful links for your use and up-to-date info:



Increase the value of your manure
Written by Stu Ellis, The Farm Gate

July 7, 2009 – Manure. Every livestock operation deals with it and depending upon the nature of the operation, manure can either be an asset or a liability.

The 2008 Farm Bill directed the U.S. Department of Agriculture to evaluate the role of manure as a fertilizer resource, its environmental impact, and its potential as a feedstock for bioenergy. If your operation is producing manure, will it have more value as a fertilizer or energy feedstock?

The environmental and controversial impacts of manure are well known to all livestock operation managers as well as neighbors, both urban and rural. Application limits to cropland, water pollution, odors, and similar issues increase the liability factor exponentially. However, USDA economists say there is an increasing interest in capturing the methane from manure and converting it to electricity. But when that is done, is manure being lost as an inexpensive form of fertilizer? The USDA study found that manure is applied to less than 16 million acres of cropland, about five percent, and corn receives about half of the manure applications, primarily from dairy and hog operations.

Recent high prices for commercial fertilizers make manure more cost effective, except for transportation costs. For large operations, Nutrient Management Plans require time and resources to develop and implement. Once the manure is applied, the primary issue is the nutrient value, which can vary and will likely not be in the correct ratio for crop requirements. Handling and stockpiling are always health and environmental concerns.

The USDA economists determined that livestock production costs would rise 2.5 to 3.5 percent if manure was not applied nearby and was hauled any distance. However, as livestock operations enlarge and costs are controlled, the economists doubt that consumers would ever feel the impact of any change in whether manure was diverted from cropland nutrients to energy feedstocks.

Among the potential energy benefits and potential uses of manure are:
1) Dry manure has been a fuel for heat and cooking for millennia.
2) Methane can be captured from biogas and burned for electricity generation, either on farm or fed into the electric grid.
3) Manure can be shipped to a central conversion facility.
4) Methane can be upgraded to natural gas for insertion into a pipeline.

Currently, there are only a handful of energy plants operating at livestock facilities. Less than three percent of dairies have them and less than one percent of hog confinement facilities have them. One Minnesota-based commercial plant uses 6.6 percent of turkey litter in the U.S. But on-farm facilities may allow livestock farmers to produce their own electricity and reduce their overall energy costs, with the help of state grants to reduce capital construction costs.

A lactating dairy cow will produce about 150 pounds of manure daily, and if applied to cropland at a rate of 125 pounds of nitrogen per acre, 2.64 acres would be required per cow. But with many dairies expanding in western states without cropland, manure has to be hauled at great expense. Hogs will each produce 1,200 pounds of manure in a finishing operation, and although hog production is widespread in the western cornbelt, it is also widespread in many states where cropland is insufficient to dispose of the manure as a fertilizer. A broiler will produce 11 pounds of manure, and few poultry operations also have cropland, but the relatively dry manure can be transported at minimal expense. Two-thirds of cattle are fed at operations without cropland, so the 4.9 tons of manure produced per head have to be transported to cropland.

While nearly 16 million acres of cropland depends on manure for a partial nutrient supply at least, the normal process may be interrupted, or the nutrient components changed, if the manure is initially processed by a methane digester. Bacteria in the digester breakdown the manure and emit methane, which is siphoned off for use. The USDA economists say farmers may qualify for carbon credits if they capture methane and prevent its flow into the atmosphere, and those credits would be valued about $5 per ton of manure. But once the methane is produced and used to heat mini power plants, what about the rest of the nutrients? They are still there, and available to supply N, P, and K for crop production. The digestion process reduces pathogens, neutralizes weed seeds, and greatly reduces odors, which may increase the value of the manure.

Livestock operations, particularly dairies and hog operations with substantial volumes of slurry manure may be able to benefit by processing the manure in a methane digester. The methane can be used to fuel on-farm electricity generators or upgraded into natural gas for sale. Farmers would be able to obtain carbon credits at a $5 per ton rate. The processed manure can still be utilized for cropland, with little loss in nutrient value, but since the odor has been removed, the manure may take on a greater value.

HAMILTON COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT :: 2009

CONTACT WITH SITE QUESTIONS